What am I not understanding?
Once again, Catholic Mission Councils across Texas will meet at a conference. The theme is how the government must be pushed to help the poor. Huh?
How is pushing the government to help the poor the goal of Mission? This is not spreading the Gospel.
The largest Mission Council attending the gathering is the Galveston/Houston Diocesan Mission Council. The Bishop's decades old order forbidding parishes to conduct any mission trips in the Mexican Border cities and town continues to exist! (Honduras, Guatemala are safer than Mexico's border?)
Jesus NEVER encouraged followers to demand that the government help the poor. He instructed His followers to do so.
The Catholic Mission leaders will gather to discuss strategies for pushing the government to do what they should be doing.
When church leaders get involved in politics they always forget their real job and ignore what Jesus said. How sad.
Intelligent Thought
Important issues, such as immigration, Down Syndrome, the national debt, social programs, military spending and religion can be argued by intelligent people. Citing credible sources and studies, reasonable and intelligent people will disagree and that is as it should be. Significant issues are only narrowly defined by the narrow-minded.
Monday, October 14, 2019
Sunday, July 7, 2019
Poor Starbucks
I almost feel sorry for Starbucks, but I don’t.
Attorneys are salivating at the prospects of the lawsuits.
Every homeless person, teenager, gang banger, and armed robber knows that they
can sit in Starbucks all day and no matter what happens, they will win!
A wino, stinking of urine and picking her nose sits in Starbucks
all day long. Someone, we don’t know who, used the ladies’ room and puked on
the floor. Maybe explosive diarrhea is also involved. Will Starbucks call the police?
Will the responding officer simply issue a summons? If Starbucks asks the woman
to leave, will there be protests and lawsuits? Are they picking on her because
of her color?
Mutt and Jeff, two local hijackers, sit in Starbucks knowing
that it is unlikely police officers will visit and knowing they will not be
asked to leave, even though customers complain about these obvious thugs. I
wonder how many Starbucks a pair of gunmen can rob in a single day?
Local gangsters need a place to hang-out that is unlikely
to make them leave. They need a place where cops will not bother them. Hmm.
Where can they go?
Black activists know that the lily white Starbucks company
would be a great plae to loiter all day. Oh please, ask us to leave. Please!
Business people know that being in Starbucks is not very
safe. Gang-bangers, robbers, militant protesters from minority groups, gays,
transgenders, and the homeless have taken over the place. The homeless really
love Starbucks. Great locations for begging and cleaning up after a hard day of
asking those going into Starbucks for some money. “Come on! If you can spend $5
on a cup of coffee, you can afford to give me more than just a buck!”
I almost feel sorry for Starbucks, but I don’t!
Sunday, June 30, 2019
America?
Reporter to Ms. C.
"Should people be sent to jail over illegal immigration?"
Ms. C. to reporter,
"Absolutely! Whoever is responsible for creating situations where a man feels that his only option for a life for his child is to flee everything he knows and risk his very life to go to the United States, should be jailed."
Instead, we blame the victims. But the bigger problem is we have lost compassion. While some still are capable of empathy (a feeling), fewer are capable of compassion, which requires action.
Millions support attitudes akin to those of Germans in the late 1930s. Blame a group for our problems. Lock the group up. Deport the group.
Many comments on the Yahoo website suggest shooting men, women, and children that are suspected of illegally crossing our border. Many suggest locking up judges that rule against our own strongman leader. Many suggest we need no Congress or Courts that disagree with their leader.
Is this America?
Saturday, June 22, 2019
Feel Safe: Relief is on the way
I used to blame the 24/7 world news cycle for our exaggerated
fears and concerns. “We read about a murder in Australia and lock our doors and
worry.”
Well, I was wrong.
Here are the stories in my local newspaper today.
- Dad gets 50 years for killing stepdaughter
- 9-year old girl shot in both legs
- Teenager indicted in death of jailer
- Son, teen indicted in mother’s death
- Bail set for suspect in transgender killing
- 3 charged in trafficking of 14-year old girl
The good news was that we will all be safer because ICE will
be conducting raids to arrest families who are subject to civil immigration
orders requiring them to leave the United States.
This is much better than focusing on gangs, drug dealers,
human smugglers, or people with outstanding criminal felony warrants. I feel
safer already.
Sunday, September 9, 2018
Police Woman Kills Man in Dallas
The recent killing of a man by a Dallas Police Officer resulted in many people rushing to judge the officer without evidence or facts. Please allow me to lay out what the media reported as of September 9, 2018.
An off-duty female Uniformed Dallas Police Officer entered what she believed was her apartment.
The apartment she entered is actually one-floor below her apartment.
She shot and killed what she thought was an intruder.
The Dallas Police Department turned the investigation over to the Texas Rangers for investigation.
The is no law against mistakenly entering an apartment that you believe is yours. If I ever received a call where a person entered what they believed was their own apartment and it was one floor below their actual apartment I would not arrest anyone. I would tell the 'victim' that he can request the District Attorney to file charges, knowing that it would be very unlikely that a charge would be filed.
There are no known eye-witnesses. The only person that may know what happened inside of the apartment is the officer who did the shooting. We do not know what, if anything, the man did that caused the officer to believe her life was in immediate danger.
Many people will say that the officer should have turned on the lights or should have recognized that she was not in her own apartment. I disagree. I don't live in the world of should.
If I came home and found my apartment door unlocked (which may have been the case) I would have been alarmed. If I came home and my key did not work, I might be frustrated enough to force open the door to 'my' apartment.
When inside my apartment, if I saw a man, I would believe that he was a burglar. It the lights were turned off, but I could see him, I would not turn on the lights because I don't want to become a clear target. I also would have had both hands pointing my weapon at him and not been able to turn on the lights.
Unless the officer confesses or creates some elaborate lie, I doubt that there is a winnable case. The evidence at the crime scene might contradict some elaborate lie, but if the officer's statement is clear and concise, I doubt that a case can be proven.
As for a charge of manslaughter, when an officer is the only witness and the officer probably was in fear of life, there is no crime of manslaughter.
I also believe that the Dallas Police Department will find cause to fire the officer, regardless of guilt.
An off-duty female Uniformed Dallas Police Officer entered what she believed was her apartment.
The apartment she entered is actually one-floor below her apartment.
She shot and killed what she thought was an intruder.
The Dallas Police Department turned the investigation over to the Texas Rangers for investigation.
The is no law against mistakenly entering an apartment that you believe is yours. If I ever received a call where a person entered what they believed was their own apartment and it was one floor below their actual apartment I would not arrest anyone. I would tell the 'victim' that he can request the District Attorney to file charges, knowing that it would be very unlikely that a charge would be filed.
There are no known eye-witnesses. The only person that may know what happened inside of the apartment is the officer who did the shooting. We do not know what, if anything, the man did that caused the officer to believe her life was in immediate danger.
Many people will say that the officer should have turned on the lights or should have recognized that she was not in her own apartment. I disagree. I don't live in the world of should.
If I came home and found my apartment door unlocked (which may have been the case) I would have been alarmed. If I came home and my key did not work, I might be frustrated enough to force open the door to 'my' apartment.
When inside my apartment, if I saw a man, I would believe that he was a burglar. It the lights were turned off, but I could see him, I would not turn on the lights because I don't want to become a clear target. I also would have had both hands pointing my weapon at him and not been able to turn on the lights.
Unless the officer confesses or creates some elaborate lie, I doubt that there is a winnable case. The evidence at the crime scene might contradict some elaborate lie, but if the officer's statement is clear and concise, I doubt that a case can be proven.
As for a charge of manslaughter, when an officer is the only witness and the officer probably was in fear of life, there is no crime of manslaughter.
I also believe that the Dallas Police Department will find cause to fire the officer, regardless of guilt.
Tuesday, August 21, 2018
In the Name of Patriotism
What is patriotism? What is meant by a love of America? What is America? Do we define America by out longitude and latitude? A country is defined by its character, its ideals, and what it stands for.
We love America because of its ideals even though we often fall short. For example, we tout our guarantee of a free press but are ranked 47th among nations when ranking nations by the degree of freedom of the press. We value education but are also ranked very low among international test scores and we pay our teachers a very low salary compared with the 40 some odd nations that provide better compensation for teachers.
Today, millions put aside our ideals and lay claim to practical thinking. Nazi Germany and many other nations made such a claim when they found groups to blame for every ill in the country. Although Jews and Gypsies may quickly come to mind, nations have blamed scores of other groups for their nation’s woes.
Today, we toss aside the ideal of welcoming the poor of the world. We break treaties, agreements and our own laws. We certainly ignore moral teachings and moral laws. We do this in an attempt to eliminate foreigners, the newest group to blame for our personal problems and those of our nation. Some will argue that it is only the foreigners who enter America illegally that they blame, yet they also blame the refugees who seek asylum and are protected from prosecution for being on U.S. soil without documentation. Our laws forbid the deportation of those requesting asylum if they have a reasonable claim to asylum. That is our law.
That law does allow people to withdraw their asylum request. So we take away their children, do not tell the parents where their children are being held, and coerce parents to withdraw their asylum applications, voluntarily so they may be reunited with their children. We do not even keep track of the children so that they can ever be reunited. We deport parents without their children.
This is the not the character or ideals of the nation we love.
This will be a darker chapter in our history than the internment of Japanese Americans during WWII. This will be a darker chapter in our history that the Mexican American War. But it will pass. The arc of our history always bends toward justice.
Sunday, August 12, 2018
Buy American!
Buy
American!
I
have no issue with the idea that when we purchase goods made in America, we help our country. More jobs with
better wages can result if we buy goods made in America.
My
issue is how we achieve our goal of buying American made goods. Taxing
imports is not the path to take. Instead, we need laws that require businesses
to pay livable wages and adhere to our environmental standards and employee
safety laws regardless of where the work on items is done.
If
companies know that it will cost almost as much to pay foreign workers or
foreign companies as it would to hire American employees, millions of jobs
would not be shipped to foreign
countries. US companies remaining in other countries
will force local companies to raise wages because they will be competing with
American companies for workers.
Fewer people will leave their home countries
for better lives in America when they can earn a livable wage at home. More people in the USA and around the world
will be able to afford American products.
Instead
of companies being solely focused on
their market price, they will become focused on higher quality goods, their
relationships with customers and employees. The employees that generate the
wealth of a company deserve a fair share of the profits.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)